The Bible and The Big Bang
The Primal Explosion is Encoded in the NIV Bible
In this post I summarized my calling to begin an assignment on behalf of Higher Powers in 1998, my subsequent training in the reading of language as numbers and pixellated images and the assignment I was eventually given in 2001: the discovery of an alphanumerical code in the 1984 NIV Bible. My website and books detail what I have found and relay its apocalyptic message.
The Garden of Eden
I call the ‘first day’ verses of Genesis The Garden of Eden. This is a template of numbers, formed from the 83 words in Genesis 1.1-5. Within these five verses are 3486 strings of one or more words, so the template is formed of 3486 numbers. These are fractally encoded with information and also serve as a kind of oracle, offering commentaries on current events. Important events are encoded with these numbers so that they appear in the Garden. Moreover, they are often arranged in tight stacks or clusters within the Garden. In a world of deceit and manipulation the Oracle will prove invaluable to us and indeed has already proven its worth with its commentaries on 9/11, Covid-19 and Gaza.
These codes are self validating. The gaping maw of The Law ofTruly Large Numbers has swallowed whole many claimed Bible codes. But one way these codes avoid it is by the device of pinning many of the encoded numbers to the NIV’s first word, greatly reducing the probability of chance occurrence.
A Unique Encoding-Decoding System
In the NIV Bible numbers are encoded as ordinal values but take on meaning as standard values, as taught me by the key I received in November 2001. This way the codes remained hidden until the time was ripe for them to be revealed. In a variation on this system, the Garden is replete with double-witness codes, either in Hebrew/English and/or standard/combined values.[1]
An Example: Jesus Double-Witnessed
For example, this double witness code is found proceeding from the Apex of Scripture.
So the first 12 words have an ordinal value of 515, which is the standard value of ‘Jesus’. The next 10 words have an ordinal value of 600, which is the combined value of ‘Jesus’. The simple odds against this happening by chance are better than 1 in 1000.[2]
In the next table the reader can see ‘Jesus’, ‘Christ’ and ‘the Messiah’ all double-witnessed in a tight stack near the beginning of Genesis.
The odds against this happening by chance are effectively zero.[3]
The Big Bang Double-Witnessed
Double-witness codes abound within the Garden and I found this very tight double stack of numbers, a double, double-witnessed encoding of the English phrase used by cosmologists to describe the origin of our universe, ‘The Big Bang’ and its Hebrew equivalent, within the words that describe God’s creation of light.
The plaintext words here read ‘over the surface of the deep and the spirit of God was hovering over the waters. And God said “Let there be light,” and there was light. God saw that the light was . . . ‘ (my emboldening).[4] In fact verse 3 is more or less framed by these codes.
But there is more information encoded here, as the next table shows.
The words between the English codes sum to the Hebrew for ‘Jesus the Messiah’ and the words between the Hebrew codes sum to ‘The High Priest’, which of course is one of Jesus’ titles (Hebrews 4.14-16).
These numbers have a second, more cosmological interpretation, giving this alternate presentation.
I think the tables are telling us that God’s creation of light was the same event as The Big Bang. This may seem quite obvious to us today, but only a century ago the standard cosmological view was that the universe had existed forever. An expanding universe is a quite recent concept, originating with Alexander Friedmann.in 1922. The first empirical observations of an expanding universe were made in 1929, by Edwin Hubble.[5]
That The Big Bang was the beginning of our universe is confirmed by these startling double-witness codes. Note how they are all stacked more or less underneath the Big Bang codes.
These are only a sample of what I have found here, but they are enough, I believe, to show that the NIV Bible contains a second channel of communication, connecting through encoded numbers the Biblical Creation story with our modern understanding of the cosmogony of our universe.
Details of The Big Bang
One of the most fascinating features of the Oracle is that you can ask it questions and receive a succinct answer. What kind of event was God’s Creation of Light/the Big Bang? Was it a slow expansion or a sudden explosion. I did not find expansion in the Garden, but I did find ‘suddenly’ (in English and in Hebrew) and ‘explosion.
So the Big Bang really was a sudden event, an explosion. But an explosion from a single point? After all, it didn’t have to.be that way.
So we are also informed that The Big Bang exploded from a single point of origin, as modern cosmologists agree. The Steady State theory of Fred Hoyle, once in competition with the Big Bang theory, is now held by very few cosmologists and does not appear in The Garden.[6]
Summary
These double-witness codes make a series of statements about The Big Bang
It was the beginning of our universe.
It was a sudden event, an explosion from a single point of origin, as cosmologists now believe.
By the textual positioning of the double-witness codes, it was the same event as God’s creation of light in Genesis 1.3.
The figure of Jesus Christ is intimately connected with it..
In the next page I will provide further evidence that the Big Bang and God’s creation of the heavens and the earth are one and the same event, and show how the Bible equates The Big Bang with further Biblical narratives, which can be viewed as metaphors for this primal event.
Bill Downie
4/6/25
Notes
The concept of double-witness codes was given to me by a friend, the late Kathryn LeCorre, who received it from the Holy Spirit.
The average word value is 47, so the first encoding has a 2/47 chance of occurring from the first word (standard or combined value could have come first), with the next number having a 1 in 47 chance of occurring. So the probability, p, = 2/47 x 1/47 = 0.0009 = 1 in 1100.
Using the binomial formula with p = 1/47 (the average word value), n = 16 (the number of ‘trials’, calculating ordinal values along the word strings beginning at word 1, word 2, word 3, etc) ) and x = 6 (the number of successes).
New International Version Bible, 1984, 2001 reprint, British English.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steady-state_model